Skip to main content

Realization - Tickle IQ Test Results

I thought this is interesting, but I couldn't post any more characters on Friendster, so i'm doing it here...

Kok Boon, your IQ score is 131
The way you think about things makes you a Complex Intellectual. This means you are highly intelligent and have extraordinarily strong verbal and math skills. Compared to others you are a highly conceptual and complex thinker and are able to understand information in an abstract form. You also show great attention to detail. In fact, it's hard to find something you're not good at.

How did we determine that your thinking style is that of a Complex Intellectual? When we examined your test results further, we analyzed how you scored on 8 dimensions of intelligence: spatial, organizational, abstract reasoning, logical, mechanical, verbal, visual and numerical. The 3 dimensions you scored highest on combine to make you a Complex Intellectual. Only 6 out of 1,000 people have this rare combination of abilities.

[Take this test]

Might as well include the previously personality test lifted from Frienster:

You're an INTP
INTP
You're on a quest for logical purity...you're motivated to
examine universal truths and principles...always
asking "Why?" and "Why not?"...can focus with great
intensity on your interests...you appreciate elegance and
efficiency in thought processes and demand it in your
communication...

You might appear low key in appearance and approach, you're
hard as nails when challenging a truth...you don't like to
deal with the obvious...at your best when developing
unusual or complex ideas...you can be an under- achieving
but very capable student...if you don't like a rule, you're
quick to challenge it and find flaws in it -- this could
make you somewhat of a rebel...if you like the rule,
though, you have a respect for it and go along with it...

A relentless learner in areas that hold your interest...you
might seem "lost in thought" to others...you tend to
connect unrelated thoughts...you would rather be the
architect of a plan than the implementer of it...you need a
private, quiet workplace that allows for flexible
independence... would rather organize ideas than people....

You tend to stay away from traditional leadership roles,
and would rather lead with your ideas...you don't get
emotionally involved, but rather tend to follow logical
reasoning.....leisure has two dimensions to you: first, you
like to concentrate and reflect on conceptual matters --
second, you like to take risks in the external world (like
skydiving?)...

You like to read, think, watch TV, play with computers..
(and post on the Storm Palace message bases).. sometimes
you'd rather do these types of things than hang around
other people...you don't necessarily like "best sellers"
or "must see" movies because you don't trust people's
opinion on what's "popular" and would rather make a value
judgment for yourself....

(Got more, but was cut of due to the friendster chracter limit on the Profile>About Me)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Story - Financial Literacy

yesterday i was kind of in luck to see news on 8 reporting that "Financial Literacy" is now taught in classes!!!! i think it should be like part of what we had as "IS" or "Information Skills". and i couldn't be happier because i knew i was ahead of many people and once again, i'm "government supported"! lols. for many years since i started deviating from mainstream, there has been a very strong curiosity over why so many people aren't like me (instead of why i just can't be like everone else). some people criticsed me for being money minded which i sometimes suspect so too. but on second thought, i don't really think i am. i knew there is a book "Rich Dad Poor Dad" on the shelf for years and i have heard more praises than anything. knowing that's it's about some thing about education and work and money, i simply avoided reading the book because i just didn't want to be influenced by some people's view...

Believe in a "Best Method"

Today, I pen my suggestion that in every situation or problem, there will always be a "Best Method" to proceed on from there or to handle it. I raised this suggestion back in camp during one of the heated discussion. The purpose of my suggestion is to solve the apparent deadlock of "Should we kill 1 to save 10". (which to me is a no brainer question, but some appeared to enjoy confusing it with many other less important considerations). First and foremost, knowing the implication of the existence of a "Best Method in every situation" puts meaning to our discussion, otherwise, it's just useless talk. This is something I left out during the bunk-debate and i regretted not having the chance to clarify. The implication is this: - If a "Best Method" exist, then we can say there is no other better choice than to choose the best method. Thus we should always choose the best method. - If a "Best Method" exist, and if a systematic way to dis...